10.0 Earthquake Movie Download

Posted on  by admin
The faults of our fracking

As a series of earthquakes start tearing apart Los Angeles, Emily and Jason race through the ruined city in hopes of diverting the epicenter to save millions of lives.

  1. Los Angeles is about to be hit by a devastating earthquake, and time is running out to save the city from imminent danger. 10.0 Earthquake streaming: where to watch online? Currently you are able to watch '10.0 Earthquake' streaming on Amazon Prime Video, Hulu, Hoopla or for free with ads on Tubi TV, Pluto TV, VUDU Free.
  2. Earthquake is a 1974 American disaster film that achieved huge box-office success, continuing the disaster film genre of the 1970s where recognizable all-star casts attempt to survive life or death situations. The plot concerns the struggle for survival after a catastrophic earthquake destroys most of the city of Los Angeles, California.
Prismark1022 February 2015
Its one of these Syfy channel productions with a cheesy comedy disaster scenario and equally cheesy special effects.
There are a series of small earthquakes tearing apart Los Angeles. Two scientists believe that it is all building to a super-quake that will drop the entire city into a lava filled basin. They show this by hitting a hammer on a car windscreen and still having to rely on bad CGI effects for this demonstration to work.
An Engineer whose company is responsible for the quakes due to their fracking activities helps the scientists with a bizarre plan to somehow divert the epic enter to a less populated area of LA and save millions of lives.
The film starts of slowly enough as the fissures lead to people disappearing in various scenarios although we get an eyeful of some lovely ladies in bikinis. There is some nice location shots of various parts of LA as the film tries to set the scene.
However we just wait and wait for the 10.0 Earthquake and get teased with some fault lines here, the Capitol Building being wrecked there but its really a poorly written film with cheap effects and a crummy plot.
24 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dude...Dude?
elliott7821225 May 2015
I love disaster flicks often I work from home and just put them on my streaming playlist to fill the silent void as I work. I have discovered a few hidden gems using this practice, however this is not a gem, dude its a dud. David Chokachi is a decent actor wasted in this below average snooze fest. I've become accustomed to the works of the Asylum,UFO Films ,and Cinetel,enter now Marisa Films, what are these Tax Shelters? Remember back in the day low budget movies that actually tried to live up to the big guys, not anymore cheap special FX no attempt to make a quality production just sell it to one of the hundreds of worldwide TV channels and break even. Your not missing anything by not swing this movie.
25 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Definitely not worth it
ben_thurber14 October 2015
When it comes to movies, there are certain grades I put things under. There's 'Must see in Theaters,' 'Can wait for streaming,' and 'Possibly will play on a certain station soon.' This one ranked below all of them. Sure, it could be argued that it was about the perceived dangers of fracking, but the writers clearly did no research about it, except, maybe, to look it up on Wikipedia. Sure, if there are 'statements' made in movies, I can usually watch with mild interest and try and figure out what they're saying, but this was just ridiculous. We kept waiting for the big, promised finale, but it failed on this and many other levels. DNW. Do NOT Watch.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10.0 Earthquake Movie Download This was a disaster movie - A TRUE DISASTER OF A MOVIE
vicdru115 October 2015
Why and how do these kind of films ever get made? This one was not in the least suspenseful or exciting. It was ridiculously predictable and I knew in the first 10 minutes who would live, who would die, who was getting a divorce, would come together and after disaster hits, find their daughter walking down the road in the middle of the night in the Angeles National Forest and they would live happily ever after. Seriously Hollywood, disasters do NOT always have a happy ending, how about a disaster movie that is even somewhat close to reality? I miss the Irwin Allen disaster movies where you got to know and care about the characters and were shocked or delighted when they lived or died. There was no one to care about in this film and the only '10' about the film was simply the title.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hmmmmmm
gregallen-2890730 December 2015
Was having a browse through Netflix as you do and spotted this film. Never heard of if but thought I'd give a go as it sounded right up my street. Didn't take long to figure out that my salary would have produced a better movie and though clearly a tongue in cheek knock off of more expensive and bold disaster flicks, It was still a poor movie. After the last 10 cents was spent on editing even the director himself surely cringed with embarrassment at what was left but had been fiscally left with no choice but to release it. I gave it far more respect than it deserved by watching to the end in the vain hope that even this silly piece of twaddle may turn up an exciting finale....... Unfortunately not and all I was left with was an overwhelming sense of unfulfilment and the desire perhaps for the ground to open up beneath me
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An instant classic bad movie!
victorbaylao6 April 2016
Anyone who takes this movie seriously needs a head doctor...! Urgent! I was truly entertained by this. Of course its not as bad as classics like Troll 2, Samurai Cop, but it has it all: Bad acting, horrible scripting, bad effects, stupid one liners...
I don't know if it's done purposely or not, don't care really, it just takes the disaster movie gender (which is famous for being bad and not even being aware of it) to a whole new level of shlock,taking a giant crap on it!
Definitely a must see if you're into that sort of movie, I guarantee you're going to laugh the entire piece!
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Just for fun.
alfredenewman-824-3572321 June 2016
If you're looking for an Oscar winner keep on looking. But if you just want to have fun this is at least that. Just ignore the acting. Watch it with your significant other just for fun, just without any expectations. It might surprise you and you'll agree with me. If you've ever been to Los Angeles it's interesting too to see the landmarks crumble. It IS a bit campy I'll admit. But the humor will at least make you smile. Just don't expect to be rolling on the floor laughing your --- off. Sure they didn't pay much for their special effects but they weren't awful. It comes close to being an anti-fracking statement but there really wasn't any mention in the dialogue of stopping it. So don't write it off. It's fun.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well, I Enjoyed It!
xetaprime-6425712 March 2016
I'll give this a 7. Seems like everyone else has this at a 2 or below. Okay, why? Cons: Cliché, cliché, cliché. Won't give anything away but it is true, this movie if full of clichés. But if you ask me the pros ain't so bad. Pros: The dialogue and screenplay save this movie. There are a few solid laugh- out-loud moments in the writing department. Don't want to give them away but this is not by far as bad as some are saying. And I do cherish LOL when it happens. The effects, I've seen worse. Granted this was seen on a computer monitor but still, fine with me, I knew what I was getting into. Did I mention clichés? Yeah, if they had, for example, made this person not the baddie...? Or... And the acting was above par for a disaster movie and if it weren't for some of the clichés the characters would have been even better- but even with the clichés I think job well done. Mind you I'm grading a 7 on TV disaster fair. And of course a few glasses of wine helps too.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink

10.0 Earthquake Full Movie Download In Hindi Filmyzilla

really bad acting.
ashlynbackup8 January 2021
My boyfriend and i laughed so hard at how bad and cringy the acting is. a lot of the things that happen in the movie doesn't even need to happen, it doesn't push the story forward. but they needed extra stuff for screen time i guess.
honestly it's so sad how bad the effects arebut that was the funniest part
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oh, boy....
tabaquij18 August 2019
When the 'teen' daughter that dad is angsting over (a camping trip! no adults! boys!!!!) is played by a 27 year old who reads closer to thirty-something, you know it's not gonna be good.
And it's just...really not.
Good background noise for when you need something to lull you to sleep.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2012 (2009) mockbuster version in 2014
seckinlergafri13 October 2017
I watched this movie a few minutes ago .. The movie is very flat, no tension, silly, and unclear .. The movie is like a 2012 movie (2009) by Roland Emmerich, but 10.0 Earthquake (2014) is much different from the 2012 movie (2009). About two scientists trying to save the city of Los Angeles from a magnitude 10.0 earthquake, and blah blah blah, elsewhere teenage characters are stupid and annoying they had an accident caused by the earthquake ... And blah blah blah ... I see this movie is so ridiculous .. The character is lousy .... The acting is pretty .. CGI is very very bad ..... This film added crummy when his poster is similar to film 2012 (2009).
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don't waste your time
msaness2 June 2020
This movie was so poorly written and corny, I can't believe a company paid to produce it. The writing was HORRIBLE! Don't bother! A total waste of time that isn't even fun.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Congratulations
olavo-358507 May 2020
This is the worst movie ever... ever... ever.Thank you so much, after this movie , I always watch better movies because is impossible be worst. This is a world record and will be for every.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What in the frack....
ElleMnop22 July 2019
What did I just subject myself to? I don't even know where to begin. From bad writing, bad acting, to bad filming this hour and a half movie was excruciating. Do yourself a favor and skip it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
OMG I was waiting for something interesting
pisani4161 July 2019
This movie was so bad, I thought it might get better. Definitely the WORST movie I have ever seen, horrible acting, horrible story, horrible research just plain bad. Honestly cant think of anything good, except the dog
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Trash
duenazomar20 July 2020
Garbage. Not a Hollywood movie. Poor acting. Waste of time.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Disgusting movie...
guljannat28 June 2020
Very bad graphic. Not a good movie to watch with the family. We couldn't keep watching..... We stopped watching half of the way...
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This is just so much fun!
asage1927 March 2020
Ignore the really bad reviews. If you loved Sharknado, you'll love this. (It's better than Sharknado ;> ). It's funny, it's supposed to be funny, and it's very good at what it does. People have been complaining about clichés, but that is pretty much the point. Clearly this is a fond send-up of the genre, and it's quite successful :) Incidentally, the movie has a pretty good cast, it has some actors of high quality. I'm thinking that people who were expecting some other type of movie may have not seen enough disaster movies to appreciate how good this movie is :)
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fracking Earthquake Scenario
gbkmmaurstad22 September 2017
In this California earthquake movie, fracking is responsible for setting off increasing earthquakes which will lead to the collapse of the entire LA basin if not halted.
Emily (Cameron Richardson) is a new seismologist with a theory who gets grumpy 'ole seismologist Gladstone (Jeffrey Jones) to convince Jack, the engineer at company doing the fracking, what disaster is to come if the company is not shut down.
In the interim, Jack and his wife are just about to be divorced, but reunite to try and save their daughter who is in the middle of the danger zone. Predictable? Yes. Worth the watch? Good one for the teens sleepover.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not the Best, Not the Worst
mandagrammy2 February 2021
Okay, this is not the best disaster flick ever made, but it was entertaining enough to keep me watching. There are plenty of cliches, and I could almost always tell who was going to 'bite the dust' so to speak, but there were a few times that I was surprised by what happened. I thought the special effects were pretty good, for the most part. All in all, I wouldn't pay money to watch it in the theater, but it was worth my time streaming it online. Warning: there are a few corny moments that will make you grit your teeth.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I gave 4 to a movie that is 2
caelum-natura28 January 2021
Why? Because I love people who try. Even if they fail... :) This movie actualy has elements of dark comedy. If they stated it is dark comedy or parody, they'd actually get higher IMDB score.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What a disaster
ajdavis-668566 September 2020
I made it about 20 minutes before I had to turn it off. Really bad acting (with a couple exceptions). Really bad CGI. Plot was all over the place. Turned it off so I didn't waste anymore time. Was in the mood for a good disaster movie. This is not a good disaster movie. The movie itself is a disaster though.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jeffery Jones is a Hoot
lancehargitt17 June 2020
Jeffery Jones as the 'mad scientist' made this movie palatable, barely.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad acting perfected.
trudy-kain9 June 2020
A cliche of bad acting and stereotypes. I knew this was going to be awful after two minutes, but I pressed on. I was exhausted and had nothing else to do. This ranks in the five worst movies I have ever seen, no - maybe three.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Uh oh...
hannah-136968 June 2020
That's what happens when you 'frack' too much!😣 Seriously it's a pretty good movie if you enjoy disaster movies as much as I do!!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.
The faults of our fracking
Prismark1022 February 2015
Its one of these Syfy channel productions with a cheesy comedy disaster scenario and equally cheesy special effects.
There are a series of small earthquakes tearing apart Los Angeles. Two scientists believe that it is all building to a super-quake that will drop the entire city into a lava filled basin. They show this by hitting a hammer on a car windscreen and still having to rely on bad CGI effects for this demonstration to work.
An Engineer whose company is responsible for the quakes due to their fracking activities helps the scientists with a bizarre plan to somehow divert the epic enter to a less populated area of LA and save millions of lives.
The film starts of slowly enough as the fissures lead to people disappearing in various scenarios although we get an eyeful of some lovely ladies in bikinis. There is some nice location shots of various parts of LA as the film tries to set the scene.
However we just wait and wait for the 10.0 Earthquake and get teased with some fault lines here, the Capitol Building being wrecked there but its really a poorly written film with cheap effects and a crummy plot.
24 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dude...Dude?
elliott7821225 May 2015
I love disaster flicks often I work from home and just put them on my streaming playlist to fill the silent void as I work. I have discovered a few hidden gems using this practice, however this is not a gem, dude its a dud. David Chokachi is a decent actor wasted in this below average snooze fest. I've become accustomed to the works of the Asylum,UFO Films ,and Cinetel,enter now Marisa Films, what are these Tax Shelters? Remember back in the day low budget movies that actually tried to live up to the big guys, not anymore cheap special FX no attempt to make a quality production just sell it to one of the hundreds of worldwide TV channels and break even. Your not missing anything by not swing this movie.
25 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Definitely not worth it
ben_thurber14 October 2015
When it comes to movies, there are certain grades I put things under. There's 'Must see in Theaters,' 'Can wait for streaming,' and 'Possibly will play on a certain station soon.' This one ranked below all of them. Sure, it could be argued that it was about the perceived dangers of fracking, but the writers clearly did no research about it, except, maybe, to look it up on Wikipedia. Sure, if there are 'statements' made in movies, I can usually watch with mild interest and try and figure out what they're saying, but this was just ridiculous. We kept waiting for the big, promised finale, but it failed on this and many other levels. DNW. Do NOT Watch.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This was a disaster movie - A TRUE DISASTER OF A MOVIE
vicdru115 October 2015
Why and how do these kind of films ever get made? This one was not in the least suspenseful or exciting. It was ridiculously predictable and I knew in the first 10 minutes who would live, who would die, who was getting a divorce, would come together and after disaster hits, find their daughter walking down the road in the middle of the night in the Angeles National Forest and they would live happily ever after. Seriously Hollywood, disasters do NOT always have a happy ending, how about a disaster movie that is even somewhat close to reality? I miss the Irwin Allen disaster movies where you got to know and care about the characters and were shocked or delighted when they lived or died. There was no one to care about in this film and the only '10' about the film was simply the title.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hmmmmmm
gregallen-2890730 December 2015
Was having a browse through Netflix as you do and spotted this film. Never heard of if but thought I'd give a go as it sounded right up my street. Didn't take long to figure out that my salary would have produced a better movie and though clearly a tongue in cheek knock off of more expensive and bold disaster flicks, It was still a poor movie. After the last 10 cents was spent on editing even the director himself surely cringed with embarrassment at what was left but had been fiscally left with no choice but to release it. I gave it far more respect than it deserved by watching to the end in the vain hope that even this silly piece of twaddle may turn up an exciting finale....... Unfortunately not and all I was left with was an overwhelming sense of unfulfilment and the desire perhaps for the ground to open up beneath me
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An instant classic bad movie!
victorbaylao6 April 2016
Anyone who takes this movie seriously needs a head doctor...! Urgent! I was truly entertained by this. Of course its not as bad as classics like Troll 2, Samurai Cop, but it has it all: Bad acting, horrible scripting, bad effects, stupid one liners...
I don't know if it's done purposely or not, don't care really, it just takes the disaster movie gender (which is famous for being bad and not even being aware of it) to a whole new level of shlock,taking a giant crap on it!
Definitely a must see if you're into that sort of movie, I guarantee you're going to laugh the entire piece!
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Just for fun.
alfredenewman-824-3572321 June 2016
If you're looking for an Oscar winner keep on looking. But if you just want to have fun this is at least that. Just ignore the acting. Watch it with your significant other just for fun, just without any expectations. It might surprise you and you'll agree with me. If you've ever been to Los Angeles it's interesting too to see the landmarks crumble. It IS a bit campy I'll admit. But the humor will at least make you smile. Just don't expect to be rolling on the floor laughing your --- off. Sure they didn't pay much for their special effects but they weren't awful. It comes close to being an anti-fracking statement but there really wasn't any mention in the dialogue of stopping it. So don't write it off. It's fun.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well, I Enjoyed It!
xetaprime-6425712 March 2016
I'll give this a 7. Seems like everyone else has this at a 2 or below. Okay, why? Cons: Cliché, cliché, cliché. Won't give anything away but it is true, this movie if full of clichés. But if you ask me the pros ain't so bad. Pros: The dialogue and screenplay save this movie. There are a few solid laugh- out-loud moments in the writing department. Don't want to give them away but this is not by far as bad as some are saying. And I do cherish LOL when it happens. The effects, I've seen worse. Granted this was seen on a computer monitor but still, fine with me, I knew what I was getting into. Did I mention clichés? Yeah, if they had, for example, made this person not the baddie...? Or... And the acting was above par for a disaster movie and if it weren't for some of the clichés the characters would have been even better- but even with the clichés I think job well done. Mind you I'm grading a 7 on TV disaster fair. And of course a few glasses of wine helps too.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
really bad acting.
ashlynbackup8 January 2021
My boyfriend and i laughed so hard at how bad and cringy the acting is. a lot of the things that happen in the movie doesn't even need to happen, it doesn't push the story forward. but they needed extra stuff for screen time i guess.
honestly it's so sad how bad the effects arebut that was the funniest part
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oh, boy....
tabaquij18 August 2019
When the 'teen' daughter that dad is angsting over (a camping trip! no adults! boys!!!!) is played by a 27 year old who reads closer to thirty-something, you know it's not gonna be good.
And it's just...really not.
Good background noise for when you need something to lull you to sleep.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2012 (2009) mockbuster version in 2014
seckinlergafri13 October 2017
I watched this movie a few minutes ago .. The movie is very flat, no tension, silly, and unclear .. The movie is like a 2012 movie (2009) by Roland Emmerich, but 10.0 Earthquake (2014) is much different from the 2012 movie (2009). About two scientists trying to save the city of Los Angeles from a magnitude 10.0 earthquake, and blah blah blah, elsewhere teenage characters are stupid and annoying they had an accident caused by the earthquake ... And blah blah blah ... I see this movie is so ridiculous .. The character is lousy .... The acting is pretty .. CGI is very very bad ..... This film added crummy when his poster is similar to film 2012 (2009).
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don't waste your time
msaness2 June 2020
This movie was so poorly written and corny, I can't believe a company paid to produce it. The writing was HORRIBLE! Don't bother! A total waste of time that isn't even fun.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Congratulations
olavo-358507 May 2020
This is the worst movie ever... ever... ever.Thank you so much, after this movie , I always watch better movies because is impossible be worst. This is a world record and will be for every.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What in the frack....

10.0 Earthquake Movie Download Torrent

ElleMnop22 July 2019
What did I just subject myself to? I don't even know where to begin. From bad writing, bad acting, to bad filming this hour and a half movie was excruciating. Do yourself a favor and skip it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
OMG I was waiting for something interesting
pisani4161 July 2019
This movie was so bad, I thought it might get better. Definitely the WORST movie I have ever seen, horrible acting, horrible story, horrible research just plain bad. Honestly cant think of anything good, except the dog
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Trash
duenazomar20 July 2020
Garbage. Not a Hollywood movie. Poor acting. Waste of time.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Disgusting movie...
guljannat28 June 2020
Very bad graphic. Not a good movie to watch with the family. We couldn't keep watching..... We stopped watching half of the way...
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This is just so much fun!
asage1927 March 2020
Ignore the really bad reviews. If you loved Sharknado, you'll love this. (It's better than Sharknado ;> ). It's funny, it's supposed to be funny, and it's very good at what it does. People have been complaining about clichés, but that is pretty much the point. Clearly this is a fond send-up of the genre, and it's quite successful :) Incidentally, the movie has a pretty good cast, it has some actors of high quality. I'm thinking that people who were expecting some other type of movie may have not seen enough disaster movies to appreciate how good this movie is :)
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fracking Earthquake Scenario
gbkmmaurstad22 September 2017
In this California earthquake movie, fracking is responsible for setting off increasing earthquakes which will lead to the collapse of the entire LA basin if not halted.
Emily (Cameron Richardson) is a new seismologist with a theory who gets grumpy 'ole seismologist Gladstone (Jeffrey Jones) to convince Jack, the engineer at company doing the fracking, what disaster is to come if the company is not shut down.
In the interim, Jack and his wife are just about to be divorced, but reunite to try and save their daughter who is in the middle of the danger zone. Predictable? Yes. Worth the watch? Good one for the teens sleepover.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not the Best, Not the Worst
mandagrammy2 February 2021
Okay, this is not the best disaster flick ever made, but it was entertaining enough to keep me watching. There are plenty of cliches, and I could almost always tell who was going to 'bite the dust' so to speak, but there were a few times that I was surprised by what happened. I thought the special effects were pretty good, for the most part. All in all, I wouldn't pay money to watch it in the theater, but it was worth my time streaming it online. Warning: there are a few corny moments that will make you grit your teeth.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I gave 4 to a movie that is 2
caelum-natura28 January 2021
Why? Because I love people who try. Even if they fail... :) This movie actualy has elements of dark comedy. If they stated it is dark comedy or parody, they'd actually get higher IMDB score.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What a disaster
ajdavis-668566 September 2020
I made it about 20 minutes before I had to turn it off. Really bad acting (with a couple exceptions). Really bad CGI. Plot was all over the place. Turned it off so I didn't waste anymore time. Was in the mood for a good disaster movie. This is not a good disaster movie. The movie itself is a disaster though.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink

10.0 Earthquake Full Movie Download In Hindi 480p Filmyzilla

Jeffery Jones is a Hoot
lancehargitt17 June 2020
Jeffery Jones as the 'mad scientist' made this movie palatable, barely.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad acting perfected.
trudy-kain9 June 2020
A cliche of bad acting and stereotypes. I knew this was going to be awful after two minutes, but I pressed on. I was exhausted and had nothing else to do. This ranks in the five worst movies I have ever seen, no - maybe three.

Earthquake Movie Cast

1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Uh oh...

10.0 Earthquake Movie Download Free

hannah-136968 June 2020
That's what happens when you 'frack' too much!😣 Seriously it's a pretty good movie if you enjoy disaster movies as much as I do!!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful?Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.